kvmdavid.blogg.se

Nehru a contemporary's estimate
Nehru a contemporary's estimate









nehru a contemporary

Nehru’s revulsion of Tandon interestingly stemmed from his alleged “ communal and revivalist outlook” while Patel found him to be only a ‘ little pro-Hindu’. These tensions reached an acrimonious climax when Puroshottam Das Tandon supported by Patel defeated ‘Acharya’ J B Kriplaniwho had Nehru’s backing for the post of Congress President in 1950. The incident cannot be viewed in isolation and refutes the idea that no fundamental differences existed between the two men. It is painful and rather tragic to reflect that we cannot carry this any further.” Through our joint efforts we have weathered many a storm that beset us and despite such differences we have got over one of the most critical phases in the history of any country or any government. Both of us, however, place the interests of the country above these personal differences and, aided by mutual regard, respect and love for each other, have co-operated in a common endeavour. There is no disagreement on the existence of temperamental differences and different outlook on economic matters and those affecting Hindu-Muslim relations. “I have carefully read Jawaharlal's note sent to you, a copy of which was sent to me. Sardar Patel Accepts Differences on Crucial Issues To undo the fallout of an apparent divide within the cabinet, both often had to resort to public airing of statements to the effect that they had abiding love and respect for each other. These differences have persisted for a large number of years, ever since we worked together in the Congress.’ The intensity of Nehru and Patel’s conflicting opinions were often matters of grave public speculation and embarrassment for the government. Nehru admitted in a candid letter to Gandhi towards the end of the latter’s life that it was ‘ true that there are not only temperamental differences between Sardar and me but also a difference in approach in regard to economic and communal matters. But their worldviews differed widely, which reflected in their contrasting attempts to shape the trajectory of the freedom movement, the Indian constitution, issues related to integration of the reluctant princely states, and matters relating to combating communal violence. Both were Mahatma Gandhi’s closest associates and wielded enormous influence within the Congress Party. Jawaharlal Nehru, India’s first prime minister and Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, its first deputy prime minister were two towering figures of India’s anti-colonial freedom movement.











Nehru a contemporary's estimate